---

Is bone-grafting or bone-healing adjunct always necessary for the treatment of non-union ? Our experience of treating non-unio by primary osteosynthesis in chronically neglected shaft of femure fractures

---

Original Article

Author Details : Mohit J Jain*, Vatsal J Mehta, Hardik J Nayak, Gaurav M Vadodaria, Malkesh D Shah, Dhavalkumar J Patel

Volume : 6, Issue : 1, Year : 2024

Article Page : 14-18

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jsas.2024.003

Suggest article by email

Get Permission

---

Abstract

Introduction: Non-union of bone is a frightening consequence of fracture management. This condition usually occurs when the body's natural healing process cannot bridge the gap and restore the continuity of the bone. Non-infected non-union can be classified into two main types: Hypertrophic and Atrophic. Our research aims to determine the results after primary osteosynthesis without bone graft or adjuvant in neglected shaft femur fracture aseptic non-unions.
Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review to include consequative series of neglected shaft of femur fracture non-unions treated by primary osteosynthesis surgery during a span of 3 years from 2020-2022. We excluded cases with partial union, identifiable systemic or external causes of non-union and those belonging to pediatric & elder age groups.
Results: We included 13 neglected cases of shaft femur fractures. Out of 13 patients, 7 (53.8%) were males. The mean age was 43 (range 23-55) years, and the mean injury presentation interval was 9 (range 4-18) months. Nine had hypertrophic, 2 had atrophic and 1 had undefinable non-union. At one year follow-up, 12 out of 13 showed completely united fractures with no functional limitation. Only one patient showed delayed union and eventually united Discussion: Treating non-union requires a comprehensive approach tailored to the fracture personality. The original AO principles (1960) of fracture healing remain the mainstay of fracture healing. Besides the gold standard autologus bone graft, many biological agents like BMP are currently available to augment bone healing. However, most of them have failed to provide consistent and promising results when there is an absence of innate osteogenic potential.
Conclusion: In our experience, an excellent union rate can be achieved without the use of bone-grafting or bone-healing adjuvants in chronically neglected long bone fractures where no previous surgical attempt was made in absence of systemic and exteral risk factors for non-union.

Keywords: A.O. principles, Bone graft, Bone healing adjuvant, Femure Fracture, Long Bone, Non-union, Osteosynthesis

How to cite : Jain M J, Mehta V J, Nayak H J, Vadodaria G M, Shah M D, Patel D J, Is bone-grafting or bone-healing adjunct always necessary for the treatment of non-union ? Our experience of treating non-unio by primary osteosynthesis in chronically neglected shaft of femure fractures. IP J Surg Allied Sci 2024;6(1):14-18

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.